Skill Evaluator OpenClaw Skill - ClawHub
Do you want your AI agent to automate Skill Evaluator workflows? This free skill from ClawHub helps with clawdbot tools tasks without building custom tools from scratch.
What this skill does
Evaluate Clawdbot skills for quality, reliability, and publish-readiness using a multi-framework rubric (ISO 25010, OpenSSF, Shneiderman, agent-specific heuristics). Use when asked to review, audit, evaluate, score, or assess a skill before publishing, or when checking skill quality. Runs automated structural checks and guides manual assessment across 25 criteria.
Install
npx clawhub@latest install skill-evaluatorFull SKILL.md
Open original| name | description |
|---|---|
| skill-evaluator | Evaluate Clawdbot skills for quality, reliability, and publish-readiness using a multi-framework rubric (ISO 25010, OpenSSF, Shneiderman, agent-specific heuristics). Use when asked to review, audit, evaluate, score, or assess a skill before publishing, or when checking skill quality. Runs automated structural checks and guides manual assessment across 25 criteria. |
Skill Evaluator
Evaluate skills across 25 criteria using a hybrid automated + manual approach.
Quick Start
1. Run automated checks
python3 scripts/eval-skill.py /path/to/skill
python3 scripts/eval-skill.py /path/to/skill --json # machine-readable
python3 scripts/eval-skill.py /path/to/skill --verbose # show all details
Checks: file structure, frontmatter, description quality, script syntax, dependency audit, credential scan, env var documentation.
2. Manual assessment
Use the rubric at references/rubric.md to score 25 criteria across 8 categories (0–4 each, 100 total). Each criterion has concrete descriptions per score level.
3. Write the evaluation
Copy assets/EVAL-TEMPLATE.md to the skill directory as EVAL.md. Fill in automated results + manual scores.
Evaluation Process
- Run
eval-skill.py— get the automated structural score - Read the skill's SKILL.md — understand what it does
- Read/skim the scripts — assess code quality, error handling, testability
- Score each manual criterion using references/rubric.md — concrete criteria per level
- Prioritize findings as P0 (blocks publishing) / P1 (should fix) / P2 (nice to have)
- Write EVAL.md in the skill directory with scores + findings
Categories (8 categories, 25 criteria)
| # | Category | Source Framework | Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Functional Suitability | ISO 25010 | Completeness, Correctness, Appropriateness |
| 2 | Reliability | ISO 25010 | Fault Tolerance, Error Reporting, Recoverability |
| 3 | Performance / Context | ISO 25010 + Agent | Token Cost, Execution Efficiency |
| 4 | Usability — AI Agent | Shneiderman, Gerhardt-Powals | Learnability, Consistency, Feedback, Error Prevention |
| 5 | Usability — Human | Tognazzini, Norman | Discoverability, Forgiveness |
| 6 | Security | ISO 25010 + OpenSSF | Credentials, Input Validation, Data Safety |
| 7 | Maintainability | ISO 25010 | Modularity, Modifiability, Testability |
| 8 | Agent-Specific | Novel | Trigger Precision, Progressive Disclosure, Composability, Idempotency, Escape Hatches |
Interpreting Scores
| Range | Verdict | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 90–100 | Excellent | Publish confidently |
| 80–89 | Good | Publishable, note known issues |
| 70–79 | Acceptable | Fix P0s before publishing |
| 60–69 | Needs Work | Fix P0+P1 before publishing |
| <60 | Not Ready | Significant rework needed |
Deeper Security Scanning
This evaluator covers security basics (credentials, input validation, data safety) but for thorough security audits of skills under development, consider SkillLens (npx skilllens scan <path>). It checks for exfiltration, code execution, persistence, privilege bypass, and prompt injection — complementary to the quality focus here.
Dependencies
- Python 3.6+ (for eval-skill.py)
- PyYAML (
pip install pyyaml) — for frontmatter parsing in automated checks